<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIY: Alien Bees Power Pack &#8212; Lose Weight on Location for &#8216;09 &#8212; pt.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lane Nahrstedt</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane Nahrstedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 04:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>I have been to your site before. Beautiful glamour photos.  IMHO you have a nice blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been to your site before. Beautiful glamour photos.  IMHO you have a nice blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-645</guid>
		<description>i mean you&#039;re mentionning for the AB1600 flash duration as 1/600 th wich is oubviously too slow but the T5 is 1/1800th so i guess the real flash duration should be between these two speeds right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i mean you&#8217;re mentionning for the AB1600 flash duration as 1/600 th wich is oubviously too slow but the T5 is 1/1800th so i guess the real flash duration should be between these two speeds right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Ok fine
And what about the AB1600? 
still not sure about the flash duration but it seems OK for action. Seems around 1/1000th right?
does this battery set up would work or do we need to change the battery and/or inverter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok fine<br />
And what about the AB1600?<br />
still not sure about the flash duration but it seems OK for action. Seems around 1/1000th right?<br />
does this battery set up would work or do we need to change the battery and/or inverter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim_kemple</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>tim_kemple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-635</guid>
		<description>@ Paff -- Because I was speaking to the Ranger RX head which is 1100W/s: http://www.elinchrom.com/products.php?p_id=64#content</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Paff &#8212; Because I was speaking to the Ranger RX head which is 1100W/s: <a href="http://www.elinchrom.com/products.php?p_id=64#content" rel="nofollow">http://www.elinchrom.com/products.php?p_id=64#content</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-634</guid>
		<description>yeah i saw that too
and what about the lumedyne?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i saw that too<br />
and what about the lumedyne?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paff</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>paff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-630</guid>
		<description>How come the elinchrome is quoted as 1100 watts?
i thought it was a 400
http://www.elinchrom.com/products.php?cat=96</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the elinchrome is quoted as 1100 watts?<br />
i thought it was a 400<br />
<a href="http://www.elinchrom.com/products.php?cat=96" rel="nofollow">http://www.elinchrom.com/products.php?cat=96</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kemple &#187; DIY: Alien Bees Power Pack — Lose Weight on Location for ‘09 — pt.2</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kemple &#187; DIY: Alien Bees Power Pack — Lose Weight on Location for ‘09 — pt.2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-355</guid>
		<description>[...] This is the second of a two part post, if you haven&#8217;t seen part 1 check it out here.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is the second of a two part post, if you haven&#8217;t seen part 1 check it out here.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim_kemple</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>tim_kemple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-354</guid>
		<description>The duration for the B800 are straight from the AB Website. I know lots of people who use the B800 at full power, the problem comes when you dial the power down. At lower power the B800 (and all Alien Bees) have slower flash durations. The B400 maintains flash durations above 1/1000 at all power outputs.

Yes the weight and therefor the price of the Alien Bee was calculated using the DIY battery + Head.
tk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The duration for the B800 are straight from the AB Website. I know lots of people who use the B800 at full power, the problem comes when you dial the power down. At lower power the B800 (and all Alien Bees) have slower flash durations. The B400 maintains flash durations above 1/1000 at all power outputs.</p>
<p>Yes the weight and therefor the price of the Alien Bee was calculated using the DIY battery + Head.<br />
tk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Muchnick</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Muchnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Are you sure about the duration for the B800? From what I&#039;ve heard, the B400 is the only Alein Bee acceptable for action photography. And how did you figure the overall cost of the alein bee? Im guessing its the head+the DIY battery and not the head+Vagabond II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure about the duration for the B800? From what I&#8217;ve heard, the B400 is the only Alein Bee acceptable for action photography. And how did you figure the overall cost of the alein bee? Im guessing its the head+the DIY battery and not the head+Vagabond II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim_kemple</title>
		<link>http://kemplemedia.com/blog/2009/01/05/diy-alien-bees-power-pack-lose-weight-on-location-for-09-pt1/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>tim_kemple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kemplemedia.com/blog/?p=249#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Ryan -

You are looking at $1.4k for the newest Norman 400b setup, it weighs about 8lbs, and has a flash duration (T1) of about 1/450th at full power. The durations get better as you dial it down (1/900) for half power etc. The 200b has the same durations, just half the power to start. I can&#039;t imagine the old ones are faster, if anything they will more likely be slower.

These aren&#039;t bad kits, although I don&#039;t know what&#039;s up with the 4lb charger. They have their own custom grids, reflectors, and soft boxes available too. I&#039;m working on a bigger master list that will be updatable, I will get these on there for sure. Thanks - tk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan -</p>
<p>You are looking at $1.4k for the newest Norman 400b setup, it weighs about 8lbs, and has a flash duration (T1) of about 1/450th at full power. The durations get better as you dial it down (1/900) for half power etc. The 200b has the same durations, just half the power to start. I can&#8217;t imagine the old ones are faster, if anything they will more likely be slower.</p>
<p>These aren&#8217;t bad kits, although I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s up with the 4lb charger. They have their own custom grids, reflectors, and soft boxes available too. I&#8217;m working on a bigger master list that will be updatable, I will get these on there for sure. Thanks &#8211; tk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
